In-House Interior Design

One of the pitfalls of having an in-house interior design person or small group within the office staff for a high-end custom homebuilder…is that if many of the architectural decisions and most of the interior design decisions are managed from within the homebuilding company…the homebuilder then also owns the myriad of “internal” RFI’s (requests for information)…which if not addressed in an organized and systematic way can quickly snowball into questions and issues that delay construction operations in the field.

The standard, arms-length arrangement of owner/architect/general contractor divides up the varied duties, roles, and responsibilities into relatively clear lines of demarcation.  Questions from the construction regarding the design plans…or requests for missing information in the plans and specifications…which arise during the course of the construction…are handled through RFI’s from the general contractor to the architect and/or structural engineer, for example…which are then individually monitored for timely response by the general contractor.

RFI’s which have not been answered that might adversely affect the construction schedule are communicated to the owner…often during the weekly owner/builder meeting…the owner then contacting the appropriate design professional regarding the particular question or issue.

The point here is that if the owner (“spec” homebuilder and/or custom homebuilder) is also generating a large portion of the architectural information…moving walls, changing layout, moving interior doors, etc., and all of the interior design information (prior to finding a homebuyer or in coordination with a homebuyer)…then the owner/homebuilder and the designer…parties one and two in the standard arrangement described above…become combined into one unit and there is no outside entity to send questions to other than internally to itself.

The procedure of sending an RFI to the design team and expecting a prompt reply…no longer exists.

In this arrangement…which seems on the surface to be beneficial in some areas such as keeping the artistic decisions consistent with the opinions of the homebuilder and his or her in-house staff…and the ability to better control the homebuyer client without the influence of a third-party, outside interior designer having contrary opinions…must be accompanied by a serious and thorough internal system of policies, procedures, control spreadsheets, and regularly scheduled office staff meetings to insure that field questions are being answered as quickly as they would otherwise be if sent out to an outside design team of the architect and engineers.

Introduction

            There is a reason why we have repetitive problems and mistakes…recurring in building construction…that reason is “geography.”

            No other large-sized finished product is either too big to be transported to its final destination…or on the other hand can easily be rolled-out and driven down the highway, lowered from dry-dock into the water, or fueled-up and taxied down a runway to be flown to an airport.

            Unlike motor-homes, navy aircraft carriers, or 747 jetliners…houses…the smallest sized buildings…are too large to be transported to building sites after they are fully assembled.  Houses are therefore assembled piece-by-piece on their individual sites…and attached to the ground on foundations designed to match the unique size and shape of the structure.

            Transporting larger sized structures such as restaurants, schools, hospitals, high-rise office buildings, and industrial buildings…from an assembly plant to their final destination…in terms of practical logistics is beyond consideration.

            Buildings of all types are therefore assembled on unique building lots spread-out all over the countryside…which in terms of manufacturing debugging and proactive mistake prevention…divides the process into tens of thousands of isolated pieces.  This geographical separation of building construction projects…the breaking up of the mass-production assembly-line…presents some challenging problems unique to the building construction industry.

            Two similar housing construction projects, for example, going up side-by-side, built by different companies, can each be making the same costly mistakes without either one knowing about or being able to benefit from the other’s experience.  The result is that hundreds of thousands of people working in housing construction alone…not counting commercial and industrial building construction…find themselves at different points on the uphill slope of the learning curve, repeating many of the same hard-earned lessons.

            This is one of the fundamental problems still remaining in building construction.  Builders, contractors, and architects do not send memos back and forth regarding mistake avoidance.  Every new building construction project struggles with some amount of assembly-line problems that were encountered and solved months or years ago on other projects…yet this information is locked-up within the geographical footprint of these past projects, and locked away within the closely guarded knowledge and experience of savvy people and companies unable or unwilling to share this information…because of economic competition between companies and competition for employment.

            In my opinion, debugging building construction is the last major area of information remaining to complete the technology of building construction.  Because of the uniqueness of every new building construction project, and the lack of communication in the building industry regarding mistake prevention, the only way to achieve progress in this area is record problems and mistakes one-by-one as they occur, and then pass along this information.

            This is a tall order…a difficult proposition…but it has to begin somewhere and at some time.

            This book is the product of about 42 years of working in building construction…of observing and recording problems and mistakes in a personal debugging effort on the projects I worked on…as a tradesman, assistant superintendent, superintendent, project manager, project engineer, and vice-president of construction…to achieve as near-to-perfect function as I could…to approach the assembly of buildings using the same error-free and smooth process of the mass-production assembly-line.

            My goal here is to pass along this information that I have collected…through a long career of learning from my own mistakes…and observing the mistakes of other people…with the intention of helping people working in the housing construction industry to flatten the uphill slope of the learning curve…to have the foreknowledge of information upfront in their own careers…for the benefit of everyone working in the building industry.